|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home | Instructions to Authors | SASE | Editorial Board | Articles | Subscriptions | Conference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract Jackson, A.R.,
D.B. Rouse and G. Ozbay. 2007. The effects of oyster (Crassostrea virginica) structure and bioactivity on water
Quality, sediment nutrients, infaunal communities, and transient fish
biomass. JEMREST 4:00-00 The
objective was to differentiate the effects of oyster reef structure from the
effects of oyster bioactivity and the ultimate impact on fish growth. The three treatments included a control
without shell nor oysters, a shell reef representing structure effects and a
live oyster reef representing bioactivity effects. After two weeks, four juvenile mullets (Mugil cephalus) as a transient
herbivorous fish species and one week later four juvenile spots (Leiostomus xanthurus) as transient
benthic fish predators were added to each replicate. Parameters measured in the experiment
included dissolved macronutrients (NO3-N, NO2-N, NH4-N,
and PO4-4-P), sediment nutrients (inorganic C, total N,
Mg+2, Ca+2, K+, and PO4-4-P),
phytoplankton, periphyton, annelid density and biomass, and fish weight. The bioactivity of the oysters resulted in
significant differences (P<0.05) from the control and the shell treatment
for almost all parameters. Structure
was not significantly different from the control for almost all parameters. Dissolved macronutrients were significantly
higher with the oyster treatment. In
the sediments, the oyster treatment resulted three times as much total
nitrogen and twice as much carbon and organic matter as values in control and
shell treatments. Periphyton and
annelids were twice as dense, but phytoplankton was reduced significantly
with the oyster treatment. Almost all
fish lost some weight during the experiment, but the juvenile spot lost only
5% of their weight on average in the oyster treatment as opposed to 14% in
the control and shell treatments.
Juvenile mullet lost more weight (18%) with the oyster treatment and
appeared to have suffered from inter-specific competition for
microalgae. Oyster bioactivity clearly
exerted more of an effect than oyster structure and in most cases had
positive impacts on oyster habitats. More
information about possible benefits and detriments to coastal ecosystems will
help to shape the future fate and structure of shellfish restoration
nationwide. |
|
Copyright © 2002-2007 |