Home | Instructions to Authors | SASE | Editorial Board | Articles | Subscriptions | Conference

 

Abstract

 

Kebede, E., J. Schelhas, and J. Haslerig. 2008. Alternative forest resource use - outdoor recreation and rural economies. JEMREST 5:00-00

 

Since the 1980s demand for outdoor recreation has been increasing in the United States.  Growing income and change in lifestyle have been cited as factors contributing to the increase in demand. This period also coincided with the decline in world timber price and loss of income to forest land owners. Forest-based recreation intensified as part of the forest management practice and compensated the fall in timber demand and contributed income to forest land owners that enhanced rural economies.  About 75% of Alabama is under forest cover, but little is known about forest recreation utilization and its effects on local communities. The objective of this study is to assess the relationship between forestry and hunting/wildlife watching and its impact on property owners and the multiplier effect on rural economies. Expenditure figures for hunting and wildlife watching from the 2006 National Fish and Wildlife Survey, and IMPLAN Alabama economic data was used for the analysis. The result showed that hunting and wildlife watching have a 2.05 output multiplier effect suggesting that a dollar spent in hunting and wildlife will generate $2.05 in the economy whereas $1.13 is generated in the hunting and wildlife and the next highest $0.73 is generated by forestry. Furthermore, value added distribution showed that 65% accrues to property owners in the form of proprietor’s income and other property income. It is fair to say that outdoor recreation is a solid source of income to forestland owners, also has a multiplier effect in the rural economies.

 

 

 

Copyright © 2002-2008